The Court will rule on each set of discovery in 2 turn. THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS - 1 1 communications by the Third-Party Platforms. The second set of subpoenas seek a greater variety of information, such as research and 24 ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RE. Both the first set of subpoenas (which Double Down wants to quash) and the discovery request (which Plaintiffs want to compel a response to) seek information about virtual chip transactions for customers of Double Down’s casino-gaming apps, which are carried by the Third Parties Platforms. and Google LLC (collectively “the Third-Party Platforms”) and Plaintiffs Adrienne Benson and Mary Simonson’s Motion to Compel Discovery. INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Double Down Interactive, LLC’s Motions for Protective Order re. THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS DOUBLE DOWN INTERACTIVE, LLC, et al., Defendants. 2:18-cv-00525-RBL ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RE. LEIGHTON 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ADRIENNE BENSON and MARY SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v.
